Hi gang. Here's another poll...
Should we include the message board rankings that we used to have (and many other boards have)?
For instance, someone with under 50 posts would be a certain rank (tire wiper, etc.), then you get a higher rank after 100 posts, then another rank after 500 posts, etc.
I can set the names of the ranks and the number of posts required to achieve each level, so first of all, vote. Then, if you voted yes, give me your ideas about what the various names should be and where the number of posts should break. I'll consider everything and then make a decision...
I am also open to folks who feel the that current deal (no rankings) is working great and this isn't needed. (I guess it isn't, but do we think it would be fun?) Bill